We actually have a few enlightened people in this Republican hellhole! Unfortunately, Stick-up the Ass AG Bruning is going to appeal... I'm so glad, with the huge meth problem in this state, he's got nothing better to do than worry about gay people getting married. Typical Repub a-hole.
Barb was one of my profs at UNL. She's really cool.Friday May 13, 2005
Appeal planned in same-sex marriage ruling
BY LEAH THORSEN / Lincoln Journal Star
Barbara DiBernard wanted people to know the everyday consequences of Nebraska's constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. She wanted her neighbors to know the ban spread beyond restrictions dictating who can marry whom.
She said it took away her right to lobby the Legislature for fundamental protections given to heterosexual couples — being able to visit a partner in the hospital, make funeral arrangements for partners, and make other decisions that a family member would make. "It's forbidding all these other rights as well," said DiBernard, who has been with her partner, Judith M. Gibson, for nearly 17 years.
The couple was one of five to share their story in a lawsuit challenging the amendment as unconstitutional. On Thursday, the couples received welcome news.
Saying that Nebraska's ban on gay marriages amounts to punishment, a federal judge declared the ban unconstitutional.
U.S. District Judge Joseph Bataillon's order to strike down the ban sparked emotions of delight and outrage Thursday, as well as the promise of a state appeal.
In 2000, the constitutional amendment known as Initiative 416 garnered 70 percent of the vote in Nebraska and became part of the state's constitution.
Arguing the amendment prevented them from lobbying the Legislature on protections for same-sex couples, the American Civil Liberties Union of Nebraska, Citizens for Equal Protection, and Nebraska Advocates for Justice and Equality filed the lawsuit challenging the ban.
In his Thursday ruling, Bataillon wrote that while the government can regulate conduct such as criminal activity, it cannot create classes among its citizens based on who they are, rather than what they do.
He also ruled that the ban went further than defining marriage as between a man a woman, and that the state won't recognize two people in a same-sex relationship that is similar to marriage.
He also wrote that the state admitted the ban limits the plaintiffs' access to the legislative process.
"These statements make it clear that the intent of Section 29 (the constitutional amendment's legal description) is to silence the plaintiffs' views and dilute their political strength," he wrote.
The ruling was hailed by Amy Miller, an attorney for ACLU-Nebraska.
"All it does is level the playing field," she said.
On that playing field, homosexuals should have the right to be a part of the democratic process, said David Buckel, a senior attorney for Lambda Legal, one of the groups representing the plaintiffs.
But Dave Bydalek, executive director of Family First of Nebraska, disagreed, saying the judge's ruling disregarded the will of state voters.
"This once again illustrates an unelected judge substituting his will over the people of Nebraska," he said.
Federal judges are not elected.
Bydalek also said the ruling shows the need for a federal amendment on this issue. And that homosexuals are not shut out of the political process or denied the ability to attain rights.
"We're trying to uphold the societal norm," he said of the amendment's supporters.
The amendment states that Nebraska only will recognize marriages between men and women, and that similar same-sex relationships would not be recognized.
It also prevents homosexuals working for the University of Nebraska or the state from sharing health insurance and other benefits with their partners.
The state had tried unsuccessfully to get the lawsuit dismissed.
Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning issued a statement Thursday saying his office will appeal the ruling and that he will pursue this case vigorously.
"I believe that the citizens of this state have a right to structure their constitution as they see fit," Bruning said.
Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel and Gov. Dave Heineman sent separate statements saying they both hope Bataillon's ruling will be overturned at the appellate level.
Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson was unavailable for comment.
Meanwhile, DiBernard and Gibson celebrated the judge's ruling quietly with a dinner of baked ziti and phone calls.
"I'm very excited, I'm pleased," said DiBernard.
She hopes Bataillon's order is upheld in the appellate process, and hopes she can lobby for the rights she holds dear.
"We don't have them now, and the judgment today doesn't mean we're going to get them."
Reach Leah Thorsen at 473-7246 or lthorsen@journalstar.com.
Copyright © 2005, Lincoln Journal Star. All rights reserved.
This content may not be archived or used for commercial purposes without written permission from the Lincoln Journal Star.
926 P Street Lincoln NE 68508
402 475-4200 • feedback@journalstar.com
posted by decemberx 10:34 AM[edit]
02/11/2001 - 02/18/2001 02/18/2001 - 02/25/2001 02/25/2001 - 03/04/2001 06/17/2001 - 06/24/2001 09/30/2001 - 10/07/2001 10/14/2001 - 10/21/2001 01/20/2002 - 01/27/2002 10/06/2002 - 10/13/2002 10/12/2003 - 10/19/2003 10/26/2003 - 11/02/2003 02/15/2004 - 02/22/2004 04/04/2004 - 04/11/2004 10/03/2004 - 10/10/2004 10/10/2004 - 10/17/2004 10/17/2004 - 10/24/2004 10/24/2004 - 10/31/2004 10/31/2004 - 11/07/2004 11/07/2004 - 11/14/2004 11/14/2004 - 11/21/2004 11/21/2004 - 11/28/2004 11/28/2004 - 12/05/2004 12/05/2004 - 12/12/2004 12/12/2004 - 12/19/2004 12/19/2004 - 12/26/2004 12/26/2004 - 01/02/2005 01/02/2005 - 01/09/2005 01/09/2005 - 01/16/2005 01/16/2005 - 01/23/2005 01/23/2005 - 01/30/2005 01/30/2005 - 02/06/2005 02/06/2005 - 02/13/2005 02/13/2005 - 02/20/2005 02/20/2005 - 02/27/2005 02/27/2005 - 03/06/2005 03/06/2005 - 03/13/2005 03/13/2005 - 03/20/2005 03/20/2005 - 03/27/2005 04/17/2005 - 04/24/2005 04/24/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 05/08/2005 05/08/2005 - 05/15/2005 05/15/2005 - 05/22/2005 05/22/2005 - 05/29/2005 06/05/2005 - 06/12/2005 06/12/2005 - 06/19/2005 06/19/2005 - 06/26/2005 06/26/2005 - 07/03/2005 07/03/2005 - 07/10/2005 07/10/2005 - 07/17/2005 07/17/2005 - 07/24/2005 07/24/2005 - 07/31/2005 07/31/2005 - 08/07/2005 08/07/2005 - 08/14/2005 08/14/2005 - 08/21/2005 09/04/2005 - 09/11/2005 09/11/2005 - 09/18/2005 09/18/2005 - 09/25/2005 09/25/2005 - 10/02/2005 10/02/2005 - 10/09/2005 10/09/2005 - 10/16/2005 10/16/2005 - 10/23/2005 10/30/2005 - 11/06/2005 11/06/2005 - 11/13/2005 11/13/2005 - 11/20/2005 12/04/2005 - 12/11/2005 12/11/2005 - 12/18/2005 01/15/2006 - 01/22/2006 01/22/2006 - 01/29/2006 01/29/2006 - 02/05/2006 02/05/2006 - 02/12/2006 02/12/2006 - 02/19/2006 02/19/2006 - 02/26/2006 02/26/2006 - 03/05/2006 03/05/2006 - 03/12/2006 03/12/2006 - 03/19/2006 03/19/2006 - 03/26/2006 03/26/2006 - 04/02/2006 04/02/2006 - 04/09/2006 04/09/2006 - 04/16/2006 04/16/2006 - 04/23/2006 04/30/2006 - 05/07/2006 08/13/2006 - 08/20/2006 08/20/2006 - 08/27/2006 09/03/2006 - 09/10/2006 09/24/2006 - 10/01/2006 10/15/2006 - 10/22/2006 02/11/2007 - 02/18/2007 02/18/2007 - 02/25/2007 02/25/2007 - 03/04/2007 03/11/2007 - 03/18/2007 06/15/2008 - 06/22/2008 06/22/2008 - 06/29/2008 07/13/2008 - 07/20/2008 08/03/2008 - 08/10/2008 04/19/2009 - 04/26/2009 03/14/2010 - 03/21/2010 07/15/2012 - 07/22/2012 11/24/2013 - 12/01/2013 05/31/2015 - 06/07/2015